Dr Jekyll and Mr. Hyde :: English Literature

Dr Jekyll and Mr. HydeI have been reading the book Dr Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. The book waswritten by Robert Louis Stevens on during in the 19th century. Thisbook was written during a time where Victorian hostelry had a lot ofstrong moral values. These codes were truly grim and controlled everyaspect of the Victorian lifestyle. citizenry in these times believed tosettle things verbally rather than aggression so fighting was lookeddown upon. People looked upon this agreeable of behavior as a sin and ofcourse they looked down upon sins as well. The upper class Victorian decree believed that everyone kept to this moral code that they had.People in this time believed that spate with very high status werevery moral and did not cause any sins. However, this book was in additionwritten during a time where there was a lot of hypocrisy around andpeople. The underbelly of this society showed what Victorian societywas really like. Though its polite and well-groomed exterior, we findpeople co mmitting sins and going against the moral codes. These sinswere however well hidden from the society and although theyacknowledged some of the evil that was happening, they still justshrugged it off saying that only the people committing evil were thesick individuals. The sick individuals also seemed to belong tothe lower class society. Victorian people were very physiognomous asthey judged people by their physicality and the word sick seemed todescribe the lower class society very well according to Victoriantimes.We know now that it wasnt just the lower class individuals committingsins, but they werent individuals either. Robert Luis Stevensonexplorers this very well and shows that the upper class rear end be eviltoo. Stevenson used Hyde very well to hide Dr Jekylls evil sidewell. Even the name is ironic. The upper class society had seemed toHyde all this very well. They kept their upper society life cleanbut they had an different side that committed sins. That is what Dr Jekyllan d Mr. Hyde is all about. The author (Stevenson) had based this bookon people in this era. He believed in the duality of man, which meantthat every person had two sides to their personality. He believed thatone side of a person would be nice and colorful whereas the otherwould be rude and dark. Stevenson who was brought up in upper classsociety, was fascinated with lower class society. With this, he seemedto become angry at what Victorian society was like and this is echoedin Jekyll.The book Frankenstein heavily influenced Stevenson heavily as the

David Suzukis A Planet For The Taking :: essays research papers

David Suzukis A Planet for the Taking     In the essay "A Planet for the Taking," David Suzuki describesCanadians odd appreciation for this great natural bounty we mobilise our own. Heis an internationally acclaimed scientist who is concerned about the wel utmoste ofCanada. Suzukis intended audience is the Canadian population that does notrealize the grave danger they are instilling upon themselves by haphazardlytaking our resources without looking at the subsequent repercussions of theiractions. The essay is persuasive and informative. He compares various facetsof science and gives reasons why none of these fields bunghole explain why we aredestroying nature.     The organization of the essay supports the authors views well. Itbegins with general opinions about the Canadian population and is followed bymore detailed explanations. The general opinions in the graduation exercise are well-chosen considering the audience. Suzukis tone is evident when he states "Wehave both a sense of the importance of the wilderness and space in our cultureand an lieu that it is limitless and therefore we neednt worry." Thesewords suggest that we are willing to reap the rewards of our vast resources butwe fail to see the harm that we are doing, and will push to do if we do notstop these actions.     Although his approach for explaining his beliefs changes, Suzukis toneof great concern remains consistent throughout the essay. After his views arepresented, Suzuki begins to tell us what we have done to our country and how weare destroying it. Present day Canadians are compared to native Canadians whichsuccessfully serves its purpose in illustrating how, for centuries, people livedoff the natural resources in Canada. With the development of science andtechnology, we have developed better ways of mass harvesting resources but thesemethods are taking at a faster invest than nature can sustain. Science sug gestsmeans of replacing these resources we are taking but there is no quickreplacement for ecosystems that have taken thousands of old age to evolve.     Following his explanations of how we have destroyed nature, Suzukidiscusses science and how society deals with it, "I believe that in large partour problems rest on our faith in the force-out of science and technology." Thisstatement and the following sentences are used to describe how people deal withgreat developments in science and technology. Because there have been so manygreat advances in these fields in the past century, people are comfortableplacing their faith in science though scientists are still far from discoveringall of the secrets to the universe. Scientists interfere with nature without